![]() In other words, products with a performance difference below 3% should be considered as having similar performance. Thus, differences below 3% cannot be considered relevant. Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty – Patch 1.5.Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended + Retouch Artist Speed Test 1.0.Power Supply: Antec TruePower New 750 W.Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 660 SuperClocked.Hard Disk Drive: Western Digital Black Caviar 1 TB (WD1001FALS, SATA-300, 7,200 rpm, 32 MB buffer).Memory: 4 GB DDR3-1333, two G.Skill F3-10666CL7T memory modules.Motherboard (Socket LGA1155): Gigabyte Z77X-UP5TH (F11 BIOS).Motherboard (Socket AM3+): ASUS Crosshair V Formula (1605 BIOS).Between our benchmarking sessions, the only variable device was the CPU being tested and the motherboard, which had to be replaced to match the different CPU sockets. CPUĭuring our benchmarking sessions, we used the configuration listed below. The CPU cooler must be capable of dissipating at least this amount of heat.īelow you can see the memory configuration for each CPU. TDP stands for Thermal Design Power and states the maximum amount of heat the CPU can dissipate. The Phenom II X6 1100T is no longer sold. Prices were researched at on the day we published this review, except for the FX-8350, which is the price provided by AMD. With the other CPUs included in our review, every core is a complete CPU, each with its own front-end engine. So, each pair of CPU cores is part of the same “module,” and the FX-8350 and the FX-8150 are comprised of four of these modules. It is important to understand that with the FX CPUs from AMD, each pair of CPU cores share the same front-end engine (i.e., the fetch unit, the L1 instruction cache, and the instruction decoders). The Core i5 processors included in our comparison do not support the Hyper-Threading technology. All CPUs support a “turbo clock” technology, which increases the CPU internal clock as needed. On the Phenom II X6 1100T, the HyperTransport bus (which is used to connect the CPU to the chipset) works at 2 GHz (8 MB/s) the memory controller works at 2 GHz, while on the FX CPUs the HyperTransport bus works at 2.6 GHz (10.4 GB/s) and the memory controller works at 2.2 GHz. All CPUs support the SSE4 instruction set (both SSE4.1 and SSE4.2) and the AVX instruction set, except for the Phenom II X6 1100T, which doesn’t support these instruction sets. I can finally have my comp be almost inaudible when browsing or on youtube, at a damned fast speed.In the tables below, we compare the main features of the CPUs included in our review. I decided to bump my mem voltage from stock 1.585 to 1.595, and now everything is a dream. I was having issues running at 5ghz at lower voltages, but It may of been my memory. Here's My Validation when under the 7th run of Cinebench I ran AC4, my max in-game temp was 56*, benching 10 times in a row, my max temp according to Core Temp was 53* on PERFORMANCE mode on my rad, and 58* when on balenced, because that **** gets noisy. When it didn't crash, and to my suprise got a nice 8.49pt score, and the squares for each core seemed to hang up less (perhaps higher stability from lower heat). I proceeded to run cinebench 64bit, expecting it to crash, already surprised it booted into windows. So, for *****s and giggles, I went into my bios and dropped the voltage to 1.48 at 75% LLC, which equated to 1.44v actual, occasionally getting up to 1.45 for a split second. I didn't care, because everything else ran beautifully, with a 8.58pt score in Cinebench ( Fluctuated from 8.39 to 8.58, for whatever reason, perhaps background processes.)Īfter a fresh install of windows on my new SSD, I opened up Corsair Link for my h80i while playing some AC4, which heats my CPU more than BF4 when at sea, and was spiking to 62-65* which.is a little over the max, and much too much for me. I am on water, so going off of extensive research, I bumped my voltage to 1.5 with 75% LLC and it was stable for 24/7 gaming, benching, etc, but crashed under prime after 20 minutes. Regardless, I did some reading on people reaching 5ghz, and most needed 1.48 at least, most in the low 1.5's. So, I was overclocked to 4.65ghz for the longest time, at around 1.42v which may have been a little more than needed, but temps were fine, so I didn't mind. I used the method of bumping the multi until I need voltage, bump voltage until stable, bump multi again, ect until a stable, temperature safe OC is reached. I have owned this 8350 for a few months, and have some extended experience in overclocking AMD CPU's.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |